An effective Nursing Care Plan for Stroke guides nurses through assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of stroke patients using evidence-based tools. Clinicians and students often struggle with selecting and interpreting the right stroke scales and applying scores to bedside care. They need to understand NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and others to accurately gauge severity, plan interventions, and predict outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive guide to stroke scoring systems, their interpretation thresholds, and clinical application framed within a detailed stroke care plan. It addresses the real problem of translating numeric scores into actionable nursing interventions and patient education.
Introduction
Stroke patients present with complex, evolving needs. Nurses often face uncertainty in interpreting neurological scores and integrating them into care. For example, a patient with NIHSS 14 has different rehabilitation needs than one with NIHSS 4, but without guidance nurses may miss critical steps in planning care[1]. Nursing Care Plan for Stroke details how to use validated scoring systems, explains score-based decision points, and links them to nursing diagnoses and interventions. By the end of this article, nurses and nursing students will have a roadmap for converting NIHSS, GCS, and mRS scores into tailored care plans, ensuring evidence-based stroke care.
Challenges Nurses Face in Stroke Care Planning
Stroke care involves high stakes: timely thrombolysis, prevention of complications, and coordination of rehabilitation. Nurses often report challenges such as clinical complexity, time pressure, and knowledge gaps. Current research underscores gaps in practice: one study found that many units inconsistently apply stroke protocols (e.g., not activating “stroke codes” or using standard scales)[2]. Another notes that stroke-specific units and structured programs are needed to meet standards[3]. Without clear frameworks, nurses may struggle to:
- Assess severity Stroke deficits span motor, sensory, language, and cognitive domains. Nurses must choose the right scale (NIHSS, GCS) and know how to score each element.
- Plan interventions based on scores. For instance, high NIHSS or low GCS may trigger ICU monitoring or imaging. Lower scores may emphasize early rehab and risk education. Nurses need concrete protocols tied to score ranges.
- Communicate with the team. Scales like NIHSS provide a common language, but only if staff are trained to interpret them. Studies show variable inter-rater reliability on some NIHSS items[4]. Inconsistent scoring can lead to miscommunication.
Furthermore, stroke care spans acute to recovery phases. After initial management, discharge planning and rehab require understanding patient function (e.g., via mRS or Barthel Index). Nurses must educate patients and families on prognosis and post-stroke care. Ethical issues arise (e.g., decision-making capacity in depressed GCS). A nursing care plan that integrates scores, goals, and patient goals helps navigate these challenges.
Why a Structured Nursing Care Plan for Stroke Is Important
A structured care plan ensures evidence-based, patient-centered care. It aligns nursing diagnoses with scoring and clinical guidelines to reduce complications and improve outcomes. Key reasons it is vital:
- Standardization of Assessment: Using NIHSS and GCS systematically quantifies deficits. The NIHSS (0–42) is considered the “gold standard” for stroke severity[5]. GCS (3–15) assesses consciousness level. Including these scores in the care plan ensures all nurses assess on the same scale.
- Risk stratification: Scores guide risk. For instance, Brott et al. classify NIHSS into mild (1–5), moderately severe (5–14), severe (15–24), and very severe [6]. A nurse knowing a patient is in the “severe” category will prioritize airway management, neuro monitoring, and early family discussions.
- Outcome prediction: Baseline NIHSS predicts recovery. Over 80% of patients with NIHSS <5 go home, whereas scores >14 often need long-term care[7]. This helps set realistic goals and discharge planning in the care plan (e.g., therapy needs, home modifications).
- Guiding interventions: Care protocols often use scores for decisions. For example, NIHSS ≥6 historically indicates thrombolysis eligibility, although stroke units now assess each case. GCS <8 indicates need for ICU-level monitoring or intubation. The care plan explicitly links these thresholds to nurse actions (monitoring frequency, safety measures).
- Patient and family education: The care plan outlines education based on scores and diagnoses. High mRS (4–5) means heavy disability; nurses prepare families for intensive assistance and rehab. Low mRS (0–2) may allow early discharge with outpatient follow-up. Documenting this in the plan ensures consistent messaging.
In summary, a detailed Nursing Care Plan for Stroke turns numeric scores into practical care steps. It bridges the gap between evidence (guidelines, scales) and daily nursing care, leading to better coordination and outcomes[8][9].
Benefits of Using Our Academic Support Services
Creating a comprehensive care plan or assignment can be overwhelming. Our professional Nursing Dissertation Help team provides expert assistance to relieve this burden. Benefits of using our services include:
- Expert Guidance: Our team includes nurses, PhD writers, and statisticians familiar with stroke care and academia. They help ensure your care plan aligns with the latest research and scoring systems[5]. Check our about us page to learn about our credentials.
- Customized Content: Whether it’s a care plan, research paper, or case study, we tailor work to your patient scenario and institution’s guidelines. We incorporate stroke scores (NIHSS, GCS, mRS) with detailed interpretation, and cite guidelines and studies for credibility.
- Time Savings: Nursing students often juggle clinical hours and assignments. Our report writing and nursing assignment help services let you focus on learning in practice while we handle research and writing. We draft care plans, literature reviews, or data analyses to meet your deadlines.
- Data Analysis Support: If your project requires outcome analysis (e.g., correlating NIHSS with functional status), we offer SPSS data analysis, regression analysis, and inferential statistics Our statisticians ensure your findings are valid.
- Academic Integrity: We stress that our service is an educational aid, not plagiarism. Our writers provide original content with proper citations. For example, a stroke care plan we produce will include references to authoritative sources (like AHA/ASA guidelines) and a detailed explanation, not just copy-paste from websites.
- Trust and Guarantees: Our nursing dissertation pricing is transparent. We honor a clear refund policy if your instructions aren’t met. Many clients have improved their grades using our case studies’ sample papers.
Overall, partnering with Nursing Dissertation Help provides academic reassurance and quality output. We have a track record of assisting thousands of nursing students with dissertations, care plans, coursework, and statistics[2][6].
How Our Process Works
Our streamlined process ensures you get an excellent care plan or assignment with minimal effort:
- Place your order. Visit our order page and fill in details: topic (e.g., “Stroke care plan – Mr. X with NIHSS 12”), requirements, deadline, and any rubric.
- Consultation and subject matching. We match you with a writer who has stroke care expertise. During how it works guidance, you can discuss specific points (e.g., including a mermaid flowchart for patient workflow, or a scoring table for NIHSS).
- Draft and revision. You receive an initial draft with sections like Assessment, Diagnoses, Interventions, Outcomes, including scoring interpretations (NIHSS categories, GCS level). You review and request edits.
- We polish the final document, add citations (PubMed and educational sources), and deliver it through our system. Expect tables (e.g., NIHSS vs. care settings) and optional images (e.g., brain diagram) if requested.
This process is detailed on our how it works page. We emphasize communication and revision until you are satisfied. Every order is secured and confidential, and we encourage you to use the delivered plan as a learning tool.
Choosing the Best Academic Support
When selecting assistance, consider these criteria:
- Qualifications: Check the provider’s expertise. Our about us section highlights MSc, PhD nurses and statisticians with clinical backgrounds.
- Range of Services: Beyond stroke care plans, ensure they cover related needs. We offer nursing research paper help, DNP dissertation help, clinical medical writing service, and even do my homework.
- Evidence-Based Approach: Quality services will cite authoritative sources. We base our recommendations on current guidelines (e.g., NIHSS stroke study data[7]) and provide full references.
- Support and Guarantees: A professional team will allow edits, have clear pricing (nursing dissertation pricing), and a refund policy. We also have case studies demonstrating results.
- Value: Finally, compare cost and quality. We are an affordable coursework writing service without compromising on expert writers.
You can find samples of our work in the samples section. Reading through our templates (e.g., a sample stroke care plan with NIHSS scoring) can show the level of detail and clarity you will receive.
Key Components of a Nursing Care Plan for Stroke
A stroke care plan typically follows the ADPIE framework: Assessment, Nursing Diagnoses, Planning, Implementation, Evaluation. In each component, relevant stroke scores inform decisions.
1. Assessment
Begin by gathering both subjective and objective data. Standard stroke assessment includes:
- Neurological exam: Record NIHSS score. Use the scale systematically (Table 1)[5]. Note GCS if the patient’s consciousness is depressed. Document pupils, motor strength (limb drift), speech, vision, sensation.
- Vital signs and imaging: Check blood pressure, heart rate (AFib risk), oxygen saturation. Note CT or MRI results (ischemic vs hemorrhagic). Stroke cause affects plan (e.g., hypertension control in hemorrhage).
- Swallowing and airway: Conduct a swallow screen. Dysphagia risk requires interventions (aspiration precautions). Document NIHSS items that reflect dysphagia (e.g., facial palsy, language deficit)[6].
- Functional status: If available, get a baseline of ADLs. If inpatient rehab is expected, record initial Barthel Index or similar.
- Psychosocial factors: Age, support system, comorbidities (diabetes, prior stroke), advance directives. Note NIHSS factors like neglect or depression (if applicable) which impact care.
2. Nursing Diagnoses
Based on assessment, list priority nursing diagnoses. Stroke-related diagnoses often include:
- Impaired Physical Mobility (R/T hemiparesis or paralysis)[8].
- Risk for Aspiration (R/T dysphagia, GCS ≤10).
- Impaired Verbal Communication (R/T aphasia/dysarthria).
- Self-Care Deficit (R/T weakness, cognitive deficits).
- Risk for Falls (R/T impaired gait, neglect).
- Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity (R/T immobility).
- Ineffective Airway Clearance (R/T decreased consciousness or poor cough).
- Acute Pain (if headache/ache, though often not recognized by patient).
- Impaired Swallowing (if moderate deficit).
- Knowledge Deficit (R/T new diagnosis of stroke; patient/family education needed).
- Anxiety (R/T hospitalization, fear of disability).
Each diagnosis will tie to interventions. E.g., “Risk for Aspiration” is linked to outcomes like “Patient remains free of aspiration pneumonia” and interventions like NPO, thickened liquids, elevating head of bed, speech therapy referral[9].
3. Planning
Set measurable goals for each diagnosis, informed by scores. Examples:
- Airway: If GCS <8 or NIHSS high, goal: “Maintain patent airway. Patient will exhibit clear breath sounds and patent airway, or tolerate ventilator management if intubated.”
- Mobility: Based on NIHSS motor score; goal: “Improve limb strength.” (e.g., “Patient will move right leg on command by discharge”).
- Communication: If aphasic, goal: “Patient will use alternative communication methods to convey basic needs.”
Include time frames (e.g., by discharge, within 72 hours) and specific targets.
4. Implementation
Link interventions to assessment scores and diagnoses. For example:
- High NIHSS (>15): These patients often need ICU care. Nursing actions: Frequent neuro checks (NIHSS every 1–2 hrs)[8]; maintain SBP < 180/105 if tPA given; prepare for potential intubation if GCS drops. Collaborate with stroke team for interventions (thrombolysis or surgery).
- NIHSS 5–14 (Moderate): Focus on early mobilization and prevent complications. Interventions: Start passive/active ROM, assist with transfers safely (fall precautions), sensory stimulation.
- NIHSS <5 (Mild): Often independent but at risk. Emphasize education: medication compliance (e.g., antiplatelets), diet, exercise; schedule outpatient therapy.
- GCS ≤8 (Comatose): Ensure airway protection. Nursing: Elevate HOB, suction PRN, intubate if needed (call Rapid Response/Code), adhere to “ABC” protocols.
- Dysphagia: If NIHSS item speech/facial palsy indicates swallowing risk, nurse enforces NPO, consults SLP for swallow study, and monitors for coughing during meals.
- High mRS at discharge: If functional outcome is poor (mRS 4–5), plan for transfer to rehab or skilled nursing. Arrange equipment (wheelchair, home safety).
- Other interventions: Pressure relief mattresses, DVT prophylaxis (sequential compression devices or heparin), skin care routines, pain management if headache present, bowel/bladder training if needed.
Create a bullet list in the plan for key interventions per category. Include citations if any interventions are from guidelines (e.g., AHA recommends early mobilization[9]).
5. Evaluation and Outcomes
Define how to measure success: repeat NIHSS or GCS daily to track improvement or deterioration. Document changes in motor scores, level of consciousness, or communication. Example outcomes: “NIHSS improved from 12 to 8 within 3 days,” or “GCS returned to 15 by day 5.” Reassess mRS (if used) at discharge to quantify disability.
Include a timeline chart (mermaid format) showing stroke timeline: Admission, Day 1 (NIHSS), Day 2 (rehab eval), Day 5 (DC planning), etc.
Incorporating Scoring Systems: Tables and Charts
The care plan should include reference tables. Examples:
- Table 1: NIH Stroke Scale Summary (key item scores 0–3/4, and total interpretation as above).
- Table 2: Modified Rankin Scale (0–6 definitions from no symptoms to death).
- Table 3: GCS Score and Severity (13–15 mild, 9–12 moderate, ≤8 severe coma).
- Table 4: GCS vs. NIHSS Actions (e.g., GCS<8=ICU intubate; NIHSS>14=neuro ICU, etc.).
Ethical Considerations
Stroke care plans must respect patient autonomy and cultural values. If a patient has an advance directive or DNR, nursing interventions (like intubation at GCS <8) require careful discussion with family. Document all consent issues. In care plans, include an ethical note: e.g., “Clarify code status; educate family about prognosis based on scores.” In research or academic writing, cite sources on stroke ethics.
From the academic perspective, our writing services always emphasize that submitted assignments should be used ethically as study guides. We encourage citing our report writing or case study help outputs properly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What is the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and why is it used?
A: The NIHSS is an 11-item tool that quantifies stroke-related neurological deficits[5][6]. Scores range 0–42 (0 = no stroke symptoms). Higher scores indicate more severe stroke. It’s used in acute stroke to guide treatment (e.g., thrombolysis decisions) and predict outcomes[6][7]. Nurses use it to standardize assessment and monitor changes over time.
Q2. How do NIHSS scores translate to clinical decisions?
A: Broadly, NIHSS 1–5 (mild) often means minor stroke many go home or need minimal rehab. NIHSS 6–14 (moderate) usually requires inpatient rehab. NIHSS ≥15 (severe) often needs ICU care or skilled nursing at discharge[6][7]. For example, one guideline notes NIHSS >25 is “very severe”[6]. In practice, an NIHSS 18 might prompt more aggressive monitoring and rehab planning.
Q3. When should nurses use the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in stroke?
A: Use GCS if the patient’s consciousness is altered (e.g., hemorrhagic stroke, large infarct). GCS scores each of eye, verbal, motor (E+V+M = 3–15). A GCS ≤8 indicates coma and the need for airway protection[10]. GCS is also part of ICU protocols. Include GCS in the plan if patient is drowsy or intubated.
Q4. What is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and how is it used?
A: mRS measures global disability after stroke. It ranges 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). For example: 0 = no symptoms, 2 = slight disability (able to look after own affairs), 5 = severe disability (bedridden)[11]. Clinically, mRS is often assessed at 90 days post-stroke to evaluate recovery. In nursing care planning, mRS helps set goals: aiming for ≤2 (independent living) might be a long-term objective. We include mRS in discharge planning and patient education.
Q5. Can you provide a sample timeline of stroke care actions?
A: Yes. (See our mermaid diagram below.) Initially, score NIHSS on admission. If NIHSS ≥6, evaluate tPA window; if GCS <8, prepare airway. Day 1–2, manage BP and glucose, begin mobilization. Day 3–5, reassess NIHSS, switch to rehab plans (PT/OT). By discharge (Day 7–14), evaluate mRS and plan home care or facility transfer.
Q6. How does Nursing Dissertation Help ensure quality?
A: We have an expert review of all work. Our case study help and nursing research paper help come with references. Check our qualitative data analysis help sample on stroke care, or our samples page. We guarantee originality and follow your university’s ethical guidelines (see our refund policy for our commitment).
Sample Tables and Templates
Table 1. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) – Key Items & Scoring (0–42)
| Item | Score Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Level of Consciousness | 0–3 | 0 = alert, 1 = drowsy, 2 = stupor, 3 = coma |
| Gaze | 0–2 | 0 = normal, 1 = partial gaze palsy, 2 = forced deviation |
| Visual Fields | 0–3 | Visual loss extent (0 normal, 3 complete) |
| Facial Palsy | 0–3 | 0 = normal, 3 = complete paralysis |
| Motor Arm (each side) | 0–4 | 0 = no drift, 4 = no movement |
| Motor Leg (each side) | 0–4 | 0 = no drift, 4 = no movement |
| Limb Ataxia | 0–2 | 0 = none, 2 = present in both arms/legs |
| Sensory | 0–2 | 0 = normal, 2 = total loss |
| Language | 0–3 | 0 = normal, 2 = severe aphasia |
| Dysarthria | 0–2 | 0 = normal, 2 = severe slurring |
| Extinction/Inattention | 0–2 | 0 = none, 2 = severe neglect |
Interpretation: Total NIHSS 0–5 = mild stroke; 6–15 = moderate; 16–20 = moderate–severe; ≥21 = severe (highest = 42)[6]. Higher scores correlate with worse outcomes.
Table 2. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) – Scoring & Categories
| Component | Score Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Eye Opening (E) | 1 to 4 | 1=no response, 4=spontaneous |
| Verbal Response (V) | 1 to 5 | 1=none, 5=oriented |
| Motor Response (M) | 1 to 6 | 1=none, 6=obeys commands |
Total GCS Score = E+V+M (3–15). Interpretation: 13–15 = mild brain injury (normal to minimal impairment); 9–12 = moderate impairment; ≤8 = <strong>severe (coma). A GCS ≤8 generally triggers airway protection and ICU-level care[10]</a>.
Table 3. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) – Global Disability
| Score | Level of Disability |
|---|---|
| 0 | No symptoms at all |
| 1 | No significant disability; able to do usual activities despite symptoms |
| 2 | Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance |
| 3 | Moderate disability; requires some help but can walk without assistance |
| 4 | Moderately severe; unable to walk without help or attend to own bodily needs independently |
| 5 | Severe; bedridden, incontinent, requires constant nursing care |
| 6 | Death |
Nurses use mRS at discharge or follow-up to measure stroke recovery. Favorable outcomes are often defined as mRS ≤2 (no/slight disability)【69†】.
Table 4. Care Interventions Based on Scores
| Score Category (NIHSS/GCS) | Typical Actions |
|---|---|
| NIHSS ≥15 (severe stroke) | Admit to stroke ICU; hourly neuro checks; control BP; early dysphagia precautions; involve rehab specialists early |
| NIHSS 6–14 (moderate stroke) | Monitor neurologically every 2–4h; initiate PT/OT consult; start mobility (bed exercises, ambulate with assistance); swallow screen |
| NIHSS 1–5 (mild stroke) | Monitor; discharge planning; stroke education; home safety assessment; outpatient therapy referral |
| GCS ≤8 (coma) | Intubate as needed; mechanical ventilation; ICP monitoring; sedation as per protocol; immediate CT scan |
| GCS 9–12 (moderate) | Frequent neuro checks; consider ICU; intensive therapy once stabilized |
| GCS 13–15 (normal–mild) | Routine acute stroke unit care; patient/caregiver teaching; fall precautions |
These tables can be adapted into a sample care plan template</strong>. For example, a stroke care plan might include:
- Assessment: NIHSS 18 on admission, GCS 11 (E3V3M5), right hemiplegia, slurred speech (dysarthria), BP 190/100.
- Nursing Diagnoses: (1) Impaired Physical Mobility, (2) Risk for Aspiration, (3) Impaired Communication, (4) Risk for Unstable Blood Pressure.
- Goals: Maintain airway, begin ambulation, communicate needs, normalize BP.
- Interventions: Intubate if GCS drops, NPO until swallowing exam, passive ROM exercises, antihypertensives per protocol, teach family about risk factors.
- Evaluation: NIHSS reduced to 12 by Day 3, GCS improved to 13, patient tolerating thickened liquids, BP controlled.
How to Use Scales in Practice
- <strong>During acute assessment: Perform NIHSS immediately on arrival (or by 24h). Document each NIHSS item (Table 1) – e.g., “NIHSS=14 (facial palsy 1, motor arm 3, aphasia 2, etc.)”. If patient is drowsy, include GCS instead of or in addition to NIHSS.
- Brainstorm interventions: Let the scores guide priorities. High NIHSS/GCS means safety first (airway, ICU level), lower scores focus on rehab readiness and education.
- <strong>Reassess and update: Repeat NIHSS at least daily to gauge progress[8]. Note changes: increased score means worsening stroke, which may require changing plan (e.g., extended ICU stay). Decreasing score means improvement.
- Coordinate with rehab: Use NIHSS and initial mRS to refer to PT/OT. For instance, a NIHSS 8 might go to acute rehab; NIHSS 16 might need long-term care[7].
- Educate stakeholders: Chart NIHSS/GCS in the note and explain to the team and family. For example, “Patient’s NIHSS 20 = severe stroke; prognosis is guarded[6].” Use mRS to discuss long-term outcomes (e.g., “mRS 5 indicates significant disability; we need home nursing services”).
Ethical and Documentation Considerations
Documenting stroke scores and care plans has ethical dimensions. Scores like NIHSS/GCS are objective but can influence triage decisions. Nurses should interpret them alongside patient wishes. For example, if a patient is DNR and scores a GCS of 6, aggressive measures like intubation may conflict with their goals. The plan should note code status and explain which interventions are patient-centered.
Ethically, ensure cultural competence in education – use patient’s language and check understanding. Always obtain family input if patient lacks capacity. Maintain confidentiality of patient data when writing about cases.
From an academic viewpoint, citing in text like (Brott et al. 1989) is Chicago style. In our writing, we’ve formatted citations as needed [6].
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: How do I interpret an NIHSS score of 12?
A: NIHSS 12 indicates a moderate stroke (NIHSS 6–15). This patient likely has significant deficits (e.g., moderate limb weakness, some aphasia). Clinical use: Intensify monitoring, start rehabilitation services early, and prepare for possible transfer to inpatient rehab rather than discharge home[6]</a>.
Q2: What interventions follow a GCS of 7 on admission?
A: A GCS of 7 (≤8) means severe impairment of consciousness. Immediate actions: protect airway (consider intubation), admit to ICU, and perform urgent CT scan. In the care plan, set goals like “Maintain airway; patient to have intact protective reflexes,” and interventions like “Elevate bed, suction available, neuro checks q1h.”
Q3: Can NIHSS and GCS be used together?
A: Yes. NIHSS is ideal for scoring deficits in alert patients, while GCS is vital if the patient is stuporous. Use both if necessary. For example, a comatose patient with stroke will have both a GCS and possibly an NIHSS (if awake enough for limited items).
Q4: What is the role of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)?
A: mRS measures functional disability at discharge or follow-up. It does not guide immediate nursing care but helps in setting long-term goals. For instance, a patient with mRS 4 (moderate-severe disability) will need extensive home health or nursing care. Nurses document mRS to communicate progress with rehab teams.
Q5: Are there any quick tools for stroke scoring?
A: There is a shortened NIHSS (mNIHSS) and scales like the FAST score for prehospital stroke alert, but NIHSS is standard in hospitals. For care planning, we recommend using the full NIHSS. However, we can provide table templates or apps for quick scoring in our work if needed.
Final CTA: Get Expert Help with Your Stroke Care Plan
Developing a thorough Nursing Care Plan for Stroke is demanding. Let us help you succeed. At NursingDissertationHelp, our experts can guide you step-by-step or even draft the plan for you. We cover everything from data analysis (SPSS data analysis help, regression analysis help) to writing support (medical research paper writing service, report writing). Our clients find that with our coursework help for nursing students, they achieve better grades and deeper understanding.
Ready to start? Visit our order page to get a quote and see our nursing dissertation pricing. We guarantee 100% original work (see our refund policy) and include numerous samples for your reference. Take the next step towards confidence and academic success in stroke care.
References
[1] [4] [6] [7] National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale | RehabMeasures Database
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/national-institutes-health-stroke-scale
[2] [3] (PDF) Nursing Care for Stroke Patients: Current Practice and Future Needs
[5] 5 – Assessing Stroke – Scores & Scales
[8] [9] (PDF) Acute Stroke Management and Nursing Intervention
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393065261_Acute_Stroke_Management_and_Nursing_Intervention
[10] Glasgow Coma Scale – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513298/
[11] Modified Rankin Scale – Medscape Reference